If you want to improve running efficiency and become a faster runner: then pay attention to your running symmetry. That’s the findings of a recent study, published in the International Journal of Exercise Science.
In this article we’ll look at:
- Running symmetry and why it’s important
- How to assess it using ground contact time balance
- Ways to improve your running symmetry.
What is running symmetry, and why is it important?
At the most basic level symmetry refers to something that’s the same, or equal, on both sides. If we relate this to running, then the easiest way to think of symmetry is the ability to apply force equally on the left and right sides of our body.
Running symmetry is important for three major reasons:
- Lower risk of injury
- Improved running efficiency
- Increases running speed
As you might expect, elite runners have much greater symmetry than less well-trained runners. This is one reason elite runners have better efficiency. This also partially explains why they’re able to race at faster speeds and are less prone to injuries.
In fact, a recent study (Joubert et al., 2020), looking at the effect of symmetry and running performance, found a clear link between imbalances (or asymmetry) and reduced running efficiency.
During the study, researchers assessed the relationship between ground contact time balance — a useful measure of running symmetry — and running economy. Here, running economy was measured as the metabolic cost of running.
And here’s the kicker: for every 1% increase in ground contact time imbalance, running economy decreased by ~3.7%.
Put simply, for every 1% of asymmetry the energy requirements of running increased by nearly 4%!
One interesting thing is ground contact time balance is one of the easiest, and most accessible ways to assess running symmetry.
If you have a Garmin device with a running dynamics heart rate strap, or pod, you can easily assess this yourself.
Let’s take a closer look at ground contact time and ground contact time balance.
What is ground contact time?
Simply put, ground contact time is a measure of the time (in milliseconds) that your foot is in contact with the ground when running — from the initial foot strike to toe-off. It’s closely tied to running cadence and speed. And when either cadence or speed increases, we would expect to see a decrease in ground contact times.
We believe ground contact time to be important for running efficiency; with faster ground contact times linked to improved efficiency. However, research in this area is mixed. And, whilst elite runners do have faster ground contact times, this is due in part to their faster running speeds. In fact, during the present study — ground contact time balance was far more predictive of running efficiency than ground contact time.
So, let’s look at ground contact time balance.
What is ground contact time balance?
Ground contact time balance compares the difference between the ground contact time on your left and right leg. To do this, the total ground contact time (for both legs), is split into a percentage for the left and right legs.
Essentially, this tells you how similar the ground contact time is between your left and right legs. Highlighting whether ground contact time is the same, quicker, or slower, on one leg, compared with the other.
From this, we get a measure of how balanced, or symmetrical, our running style is.
Why is this useful? As we’ve seen, symmetry is essential for running efficiency. It’s also a key player in long-term injury risk.
Whilst most runners have a slight difference in the ground contact time balance; at a certain point there’s an increased risk of injury.
With this in mind, it’s clear that a good level of symmetry is crucial for both injury prevention and running performance.
Making sense of ground contact time balance
As I’ve mentioned, ground contact time balance measures the balance between our left and right leg. As an example, 49.0-51.0 shows that 49% of ground contact time is on left, and 51% on the right.
What does this mean? Simply put, a lower value shows a faster ground contact time on that side. Sometimes, this may be because one leg is more dominant, but it can also reflect biomechanical differences like leg length. Whatever the reason, it tells us there’s a difference, an imbalance, or a level of asymmetry.
Clearly, the optimum level of symmetry would be an exact 50-50; however, in the real world this is rarely the case.
So, what is a good level of symmetry? According to the Garmin website, a good ground contact balance should fall within the range of 49.3-50.7.
How Garmin rates the level of symmetry:
- Poor symmetry (with faster GCT on right leg) — Left > 52.2 / Right <47.8
- Fair symmetry (with faster GCT on right leg) — Left 50.8-52.3 / Right 47.8-49.2
- Good symmetry (similar GCT on both legs) — Left 50.7-49.3 / Right 50.7-49.3
- Fair symmetry (with faster GCT on left leg) — Left 47.8-49.2 / Right 50.8-52.3
- Poor symmetry (with faster GCT on left leg) — Left < 47.8 / Right >52.3
An important point to consider: whilst a ground contact time balance between 49.3-50.7 might seem fairly symmetric; it actually implies a 1.4% difference. And as we’ve seen, a 1% imbalance can lead to nearly a 4% increase in the metabolic cost of running.
What affects ground contact time balance?
Several factors can increase ground contact time imbalances, including:
- Injuries – previous and existing injuries.
- Muscle imbalances or weaknesses – especially in the legs, but also in the torso and arms.
- Bio-mechanical differences – weakened arch on one foot, pelvic drop/rotation, or congenital differences such as leg length differences.
Other factors include running on a cambered surface, or running around an athletics track.
Excessive running around an athletics track (especially if you’re right leg dominant), can lead to an increase (or worsening) of any imbalances.
So, why might track running make this worse for some runners?… Track running in an anticlockwise direction, can cause a slight increase in the work rate of the outside (right) leg. Consequently, there will be a slight decrease in the ground contact time on the right leg. And, if your right leg is dominant, this might lead to a deterioration of any asymmetry.
Sometimes, you may notice that running terrain (road, trail running, undulating, flat etc) may influence your symmetry.
On Garmin’s website, they mention that “For many runners, ground contact time balance deviates further from 50–50 when running up or down hills”. However, the effect that terrain has on GCTB is individual. For me, running on undulating terrain improves balance, particularly when trail running.
Another factor to consider is the effect that running pace has. Often, symmetry will vary depending on running pace. Therefore, t’s important to assess this over a range of speeds to obtain more of a complete picture.
When I assessed my GCT balance, there was clear variation at different running speeds:
- At lower speeds, GCT balance was very symmetrical ~50/50
- During tempo, threshold and VO2max paces, there was a clear imbalance (~51-49 but sometimes as much as ~51.5-48.5) – with faster GCT on right leg.
- Interestingly, during sprint and speed endurance running intervals and hill sprints (~49-51), this switched so the faster GCT on left leg.
Taken together, this highlights the importance of including a range of different running speeds.
Addressing ground contact time imbalances
- Seek treatment for any current or previous injury, that may affect your running.
- Include a range of different training speeds: easy, tempo/threshold training, vo2max and sprints.
- Mix the terrain up — include undulating routes and trail running.
- Don’t overdo track running, or if possible include some track running in the opposite direction.
- Address muscle imbalances — using a combination of strength and core exercises, is an important first step. Not only will this help to improve symmetry, but help to protect against the risk of injury.
When addressing imbalances, unilateral exercises — single leg, or single arm exercises — are far more effective; after all, how are you going to correct an imbalance by working both sides at the same time.
Examples of good unilateral exercises for runners include: single leg squats, single leg deadlifts, lunges (forwards, backwards, walking lunges etc), step-ups, single leg glute bridges, side planks, single leg hopping, and single leg calf raises.
Where next: 10 ways to improve running economy
Acevado, E.O. and Goldfarb, A.H. (1989). Increased training intensity effects on plasma lactate, ventilatory thresholds, and endurance. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 21, 563-568.
Costill, D.L. (1986). Inside Running: Basics of Sports Physiology. Benchmark Press: Indinapolis, USA.
Coyle, E.F., Feltner, M.E., Kautz, S., Hamilton, M.T., Montain, S.J., Baylor, A.M., Abraham, L.D. and Petrek, G.W. (1991). Physiological and biochemical factors associated with elite endurance cycling performance. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 23, 93-107.
Fallowfield, J.L. and Wilkinson, J.L. (1999). Improving sports performance in Middle and Long-Distance Running. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons, LTD.
Jones, A.M. (1998). A five year physiological case study of an Olympic runner. British Journal of Sports Medicine. 32, 39-43.
Londeree, B.R. (1997). Effect of training on lactate/ventilatory thresholds: a meta analysis. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 29, 837-843.
Martin, D.E. and Coe, P.N. (1997). Better Training for Distance Runners (2nd edition). Human Kinetics: Champaign, IL, USA.
Neumann, G., Pfutzner, A. and Berbalk, A. (2000). Successful Endurance Training. Oxford: Meyer and Meyer Sport (UK), LTD.
Noakes, T.D. (1991). Lore of Running. Human Kinetics: Champaign, IL, USA.
Pate, R.R. and Branch, J.D. (1992). Training for endurance sport. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise. 24, S340-343.
Joubert DP, Guerra NA, Jones EJ, Knowles EG, Piper AD. Ground Contact Time Imbalances Strongly Related to Impaired Running Economy. Int J Exerc Sci. 2020;13(4):427-437. Published 2020 May 1.